As I have stated in previous writings, churches are a
business, and this line at the bottom of page 721 sums it up: “many people were critical of the luxurious
life of the popes, the corruption and immorality of some clergy, the church’s
selling of indulgences, . . . and other aspects of church life and
practice.” You bet your sweet
booty! What a racket! The Pope mobile is one of the worst
offenders.
Right on, Martin Luther! Somebody needs to question those popes, because they are
some of the shiftiest people roaming planet earth.
Here we go, kings/princes, middle-class urban, and common
folk are jockeying for positions.
Martin Luther’s movement actually lit a fire under the
Catholic Church organization, to the point that the Catholics started a
Counter-Reformation! Good power
play, Mr. Luther! Don’t let those
phonies rest on their laurels.
Honestly, people are taking this religious thing way too seriously. Must they completely destroy other
people’s objects with complete destruction? And urinating on public idols (p. 729)? That is complete
insanity.
“It is hardly surprising that such aggressive action
generated resistance” (p. 729). Of
course it is not surprising! What
would you do if some foreigner ruined your trinket with his bodily fluid?
Oh, those Jesuits were even craftier than all other previous
evildoers combined. Let’s dress
like them [the Chinese], learn their language, and focus on exchange of ideas
with the ulterior motive of converting them. Assimilate, then move in for the kill. They will never know what hit them.
Oh, please, Strayer!
Christian monogamy would require men having to give up their
concubines. Then, Strayer asks,
“What would happen to these deserted women (p. 734)?” Certainly, no one was worried about these women’s welfare! The only interest lies in the very act
that has caused this world so much grief since day one.
Leave it to the pope to step in and right the ship in China. Back off, boys, you are practicing
Chinese idolatry!
That Muhammad Ibn Saud – what a nice guy! “He did not insist on head to toe
covering of women in public” (p. 736).
Here is a good line to chew on: “intuitive moral knowledge exists in people . . . even
robbers know that they should not rob” (p. 737). Do humans have built-in morality? Good Q.
Now this is interesting – how the university concept took
off in Paris and other Euro cities.
The emergence of modern science is a breath of fresh air from all of
this heavy talk of religion.
Copernicus turned old concepts about earth upside down and
started a whole new ball game. At
the center of all of this lies math; scientific principles are described
mathematically, providing new realities for non-believers.
I disagree, though, that the heart is just a machine – the heart
is a metaphor for feelings. It can
be broken so badly that it is sometimes beyond repair, and that breaking can
reverberate throughout one’s soul.
But then, my view is not the scientific view.
“Borrowing.”
That is the perfect word to describe how the world’s various peoples
responded to new ideas, conquests, assimilations, and movements.
No comments:
Post a Comment